Adminstrator's Note: The following is a comment about my "Theory Notecards" installation by RiseInRuin. In addition to its intriguing take on my piece, what makes his/her view even more interesting is that he/she lives in Chicago, has not seen and may never see my Hamiltonian Gallery installation in person. A testament, perhaps, to the "power" of a concept? Regardless, I post it here, with RiseInRuin's permission, [as is, no corrections] in hopes of generating further discussion.
"I like this. Interactivity, it seems to me, is a process contingent upon varying degrees of opposition. Even if someone were to take action by not acting in any physical way, the words on the block would alter in correspondence to the non-physical-actor’s agreements and disagreements. The dissimilars in that relationship would strengthen each other through the power of thier(sic) disparity. The similarities of the relationship are only similar because of the context of mutual opposition. It is a play of dissonance and resonance, where the disonant(sic) “illuminate” each other through mutual opposition, and the resonant “dissolve” into a powerless sameness. The resonances, to my thinking, become lost as one center of convergence, where the disonances(sic) become powerful as many disparate “entities”.
The non-physical-actors in relation to the physical actors (if I have you right) become degrees of oppositions as well, where the actors contrast the non-actors, and strengthen each other.
The experience of interactivity with the blocks is, to me, a feeling of convergence - of center - that is only centered as the mutual oppositions pull tug at each other to the edges of the body.
I like it a lot. To me, it is a blatantly expressive entity where the similarities in both a private, and collective experience, go through entropy while the dissimilarities are surged with power that tugs at the body of feeling. One is centered from the edges. Though, the edges are multifarious with different textures, colors etc., that oppose each other to varying degrees, making the center of experience a weighted, layered, array of complex properties.
Glad I ran into this. I’ve never really explored interactivity in art.